Nike vs HOKA for running
Specialist running comparison
9 runs across 2 providers
Visibility Score
Is Nike mentioned at all?
Where does Nike first appear relative to other brands?
Is the answer directly about Nike or a category answer?
How positively or negatively is Nike framed?
Are credible sources cited, including owned domains?
Analyst Summary
Nike appeared as the primary subject and first named brand, with no distinct framing signals, supported by 4 sources, none from owned domains.
Directness
Direct: the answer is specifically about Nike
Nike Mentioned
Competitor Crowding
Owned Source Present
Framing Tags
Rule-based, deterministicCompetitor Mentions
Model Answer
claude-sonnet-4-6Showing full answer
Sources
4 sources extracted| Type | Domain | URL | Tier |
|---|---|---|---|
| ★Review | runrepeat.com | https://runrepeat.com/nike-vs-competitors | |
| ★Review | runnersworld.com | https://www.runnersworld.com/gear/nike-comparison | |
| ΩWikipedia | en.wikipedia.org | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nike,_Inc. | |
| ★Review | sneakernews.com | https://sneakernews.com/nike-adidas-comparison |
Score Trend
One line per provider · all targetsLatest vs Previous Run
Change detectionNo significant changes detected between runs.
Query Recommendations
3 actionsNo owned source cited — strengthen owned authority
Create citable, authoritative content on owned domains that directly addresses this query. Third-party sources currently shape the answer entirely.
Why this recommendation
4 sources cited for "Nike vs HOKA for running", none from owned domains.
▸ View evidence
{
"brandMentioned": true,
"mentionRank": "first",
"directness": "direct",
"framingTags": [],
"competitorMentions": [
"ASICS"
],
"ownedSourcePresent": false,
"sourceCount": 4,
"topDomains": [
"runrepeat.com",
"runnersworld.com",
"en.wikipedia.org",
"sneakernews.com"
],
"visibilityScore": 74,
"queryText": "Nike vs HOKA for running",
"queryCategory": "comparisons",
"queryStyle": "structured",
"queryPriority": 5,
"affectedRunIds": [
"nike_comp_03__run_2"
],
"patternDescription": "Zero owned sources among cited domains"
}Retailer / review dominance — seed editorial authority
Sharpen retailer PDP copy and invest in editorial / review-site coverage so the answer is shaped by category authority, not just commerce pages.
Why this recommendation
3 retailer/review sources vs 0 editorial for "Nike vs HOKA for running".
▸ View evidence
{
"brandMentioned": true,
"mentionRank": "first",
"directness": "direct",
"framingTags": [],
"competitorMentions": [
"ASICS"
],
"ownedSourcePresent": false,
"sourceCount": 4,
"topDomains": [
"runrepeat.com",
"runnersworld.com",
"en.wikipedia.org",
"sneakernews.com"
],
"visibilityScore": 74,
"queryText": "Nike vs HOKA for running",
"queryCategory": "comparisons",
"queryStyle": "structured",
"queryPriority": 5,
"affectedRunIds": [
"nike_comp_03__run_2"
],
"patternDescription": "Retailer/review source dominance"
}Wikipedia shapes the answer without owned presence
Ensure owned brand pages provide citable depth comparable to Wikipedia, and steward the public reference entry so the brand's narrative isn't shaped solely by third parties.
Why this recommendation
Wikipedia is cited without any owned brand source for "Nike vs HOKA for running".
▸ View evidence
{
"brandMentioned": true,
"mentionRank": "first",
"directness": "direct",
"framingTags": [],
"competitorMentions": [
"ASICS"
],
"ownedSourcePresent": false,
"sourceCount": 4,
"topDomains": [
"runrepeat.com",
"runnersworld.com",
"en.wikipedia.org",
"sneakernews.com"
],
"visibilityScore": 74,
"queryText": "Nike vs HOKA for running",
"queryCategory": "comparisons",
"queryStyle": "structured",
"queryPriority": 5,
"affectedRunIds": [
"nike_comp_03__run_2"
],
"patternDescription": "Wikipedia cited, no owned source"
}Run History
Grouped by provider · 9 runs total